rabbit bethyl Search Results


95
Bethyl rabbit polyclonal igg
Fig. 5. EBV SM increases XPB recruitment to EBV lytic promoters but not to cellular promoters or the major EBV latent promoter. ChIP assays to measure effect of SM on XPB binding to EBV lytic promoters during lytic replication. EBV lytic replication in 293 SMKO EBV-infected cells was induced by transfecting with Z plasmid, or with Z and SM plasmids to both induce replication and rescue SM expression. Cells were also transfected with empty vector as an uninduced control. Induced cells were also treated with SPR (+S) or mock-treated with vehicle. Forty-eight hours after lytic induction, proteins were cross-linked to DNA, sheared, and chromatin was immunoprecipitated using an XPB <t>polyclonal</t> antibody. DNA was extracted from IPs and qPCR was performed for several EBV SM-dependent lytic promoters (A), SM-independent lytic promoters (B), the major EBV latency C promoter (C), or cellular promoters (D), to quantitate XPB occupancy during lytic replication. The fold-enrichment over background was calculated using IgG antibody IP as the control in each sample. The error bars indicate the SEM from three different IPs. *P = 0.0004 to 0.03; NS, P = 0.16 to 0.9. (E) Efficacy of XPB depletion by SPR. Western blots was performed from above protein samples and blotted with anti-XPB and anti-SM antibody. The blot was stripped and reprobed with antitubulin as a loading control.
Rabbit Polyclonal Igg, supplied by Bethyl, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit polyclonal igg/product/Bethyl
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rabbit polyclonal igg - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

208p  (Bethyl)
94
Bethyl 208p
Fig. 5. EBV SM increases XPB recruitment to EBV lytic promoters but not to cellular promoters or the major EBV latent promoter. ChIP assays to measure effect of SM on XPB binding to EBV lytic promoters during lytic replication. EBV lytic replication in 293 SMKO EBV-infected cells was induced by transfecting with Z plasmid, or with Z and SM plasmids to both induce replication and rescue SM expression. Cells were also transfected with empty vector as an uninduced control. Induced cells were also treated with SPR (+S) or mock-treated with vehicle. Forty-eight hours after lytic induction, proteins were cross-linked to DNA, sheared, and chromatin was immunoprecipitated using an XPB <t>polyclonal</t> antibody. DNA was extracted from IPs and qPCR was performed for several EBV SM-dependent lytic promoters (A), SM-independent lytic promoters (B), the major EBV latency C promoter (C), or cellular promoters (D), to quantitate XPB occupancy during lytic replication. The fold-enrichment over background was calculated using IgG antibody IP as the control in each sample. The error bars indicate the SEM from three different IPs. *P = 0.0004 to 0.03; NS, P = 0.16 to 0.9. (E) Efficacy of XPB depletion by SPR. Western blots was performed from above protein samples and blotted with anti-XPB and anti-SM antibody. The blot was stripped and reprobed with antitubulin as a loading control.
208p, supplied by Bethyl, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/208p/product/Bethyl
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
208p - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Bethyl rabbit anti goat igg heavy
Fig. 5. EBV SM increases XPB recruitment to EBV lytic promoters but not to cellular promoters or the major EBV latent promoter. ChIP assays to measure effect of SM on XPB binding to EBV lytic promoters during lytic replication. EBV lytic replication in 293 SMKO EBV-infected cells was induced by transfecting with Z plasmid, or with Z and SM plasmids to both induce replication and rescue SM expression. Cells were also transfected with empty vector as an uninduced control. Induced cells were also treated with SPR (+S) or mock-treated with vehicle. Forty-eight hours after lytic induction, proteins were cross-linked to DNA, sheared, and chromatin was immunoprecipitated using an XPB <t>polyclonal</t> antibody. DNA was extracted from IPs and qPCR was performed for several EBV SM-dependent lytic promoters (A), SM-independent lytic promoters (B), the major EBV latency C promoter (C), or cellular promoters (D), to quantitate XPB occupancy during lytic replication. The fold-enrichment over background was calculated using IgG antibody IP as the control in each sample. The error bars indicate the SEM from three different IPs. *P = 0.0004 to 0.03; NS, P = 0.16 to 0.9. (E) Efficacy of XPB depletion by SPR. Western blots was performed from above protein samples and blotted with anti-XPB and anti-SM antibody. The blot was stripped and reprobed with antitubulin as a loading control.
Rabbit Anti Goat Igg Heavy, supplied by Bethyl, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit anti goat igg heavy/product/Bethyl
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rabbit anti goat igg heavy - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Bethyl rabbit polyclonal anti igm
Fig. 5. EBV SM increases XPB recruitment to EBV lytic promoters but not to cellular promoters or the major EBV latent promoter. ChIP assays to measure effect of SM on XPB binding to EBV lytic promoters during lytic replication. EBV lytic replication in 293 SMKO EBV-infected cells was induced by transfecting with Z plasmid, or with Z and SM plasmids to both induce replication and rescue SM expression. Cells were also transfected with empty vector as an uninduced control. Induced cells were also treated with SPR (+S) or mock-treated with vehicle. Forty-eight hours after lytic induction, proteins were cross-linked to DNA, sheared, and chromatin was immunoprecipitated using an XPB <t>polyclonal</t> antibody. DNA was extracted from IPs and qPCR was performed for several EBV SM-dependent lytic promoters (A), SM-independent lytic promoters (B), the major EBV latency C promoter (C), or cellular promoters (D), to quantitate XPB occupancy during lytic replication. The fold-enrichment over background was calculated using IgG antibody IP as the control in each sample. The error bars indicate the SEM from three different IPs. *P = 0.0004 to 0.03; NS, P = 0.16 to 0.9. (E) Efficacy of XPB depletion by SPR. Western blots was performed from above protein samples and blotted with anti-XPB and anti-SM antibody. The blot was stripped and reprobed with antitubulin as a loading control.
Rabbit Polyclonal Anti Igm, supplied by Bethyl, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit polyclonal anti igm/product/Bethyl
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rabbit polyclonal anti igm - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

iga  (Bethyl)
93
Bethyl iga
Fig. 5. EBV SM increases XPB recruitment to EBV lytic promoters but not to cellular promoters or the major EBV latent promoter. ChIP assays to measure effect of SM on XPB binding to EBV lytic promoters during lytic replication. EBV lytic replication in 293 SMKO EBV-infected cells was induced by transfecting with Z plasmid, or with Z and SM plasmids to both induce replication and rescue SM expression. Cells were also transfected with empty vector as an uninduced control. Induced cells were also treated with SPR (+S) or mock-treated with vehicle. Forty-eight hours after lytic induction, proteins were cross-linked to DNA, sheared, and chromatin was immunoprecipitated using an XPB <t>polyclonal</t> antibody. DNA was extracted from IPs and qPCR was performed for several EBV SM-dependent lytic promoters (A), SM-independent lytic promoters (B), the major EBV latency C promoter (C), or cellular promoters (D), to quantitate XPB occupancy during lytic replication. The fold-enrichment over background was calculated using IgG antibody IP as the control in each sample. The error bars indicate the SEM from three different IPs. *P = 0.0004 to 0.03; NS, P = 0.16 to 0.9. (E) Efficacy of XPB depletion by SPR. Western blots was performed from above protein samples and blotted with anti-XPB and anti-SM antibody. The blot was stripped and reprobed with antitubulin as a loading control.
Iga, supplied by Bethyl, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/iga/product/Bethyl
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
iga - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Bethyl light chain antibody hrp conjugated
Fig. 5. EBV SM increases XPB recruitment to EBV lytic promoters but not to cellular promoters or the major EBV latent promoter. ChIP assays to measure effect of SM on XPB binding to EBV lytic promoters during lytic replication. EBV lytic replication in 293 SMKO EBV-infected cells was induced by transfecting with Z plasmid, or with Z and SM plasmids to both induce replication and rescue SM expression. Cells were also transfected with empty vector as an uninduced control. Induced cells were also treated with SPR (+S) or mock-treated with vehicle. Forty-eight hours after lytic induction, proteins were cross-linked to DNA, sheared, and chromatin was immunoprecipitated using an XPB <t>polyclonal</t> antibody. DNA was extracted from IPs and qPCR was performed for several EBV SM-dependent lytic promoters (A), SM-independent lytic promoters (B), the major EBV latency C promoter (C), or cellular promoters (D), to quantitate XPB occupancy during lytic replication. The fold-enrichment over background was calculated using IgG antibody IP as the control in each sample. The error bars indicate the SEM from three different IPs. *P = 0.0004 to 0.03; NS, P = 0.16 to 0.9. (E) Efficacy of XPB depletion by SPR. Western blots was performed from above protein samples and blotted with anti-XPB and anti-SM antibody. The blot was stripped and reprobed with antitubulin as a loading control.
Light Chain Antibody Hrp Conjugated, supplied by Bethyl, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/light chain antibody hrp conjugated/product/Bethyl
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
light chain antibody hrp conjugated - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Bethyl rabbit antibody
Fig. 5. EBV SM increases XPB recruitment to EBV lytic promoters but not to cellular promoters or the major EBV latent promoter. ChIP assays to measure effect of SM on XPB binding to EBV lytic promoters during lytic replication. EBV lytic replication in 293 SMKO EBV-infected cells was induced by transfecting with Z plasmid, or with Z and SM plasmids to both induce replication and rescue SM expression. Cells were also transfected with empty vector as an uninduced control. Induced cells were also treated with SPR (+S) or mock-treated with vehicle. Forty-eight hours after lytic induction, proteins were cross-linked to DNA, sheared, and chromatin was immunoprecipitated using an XPB <t>polyclonal</t> antibody. DNA was extracted from IPs and qPCR was performed for several EBV SM-dependent lytic promoters (A), SM-independent lytic promoters (B), the major EBV latency C promoter (C), or cellular promoters (D), to quantitate XPB occupancy during lytic replication. The fold-enrichment over background was calculated using IgG antibody IP as the control in each sample. The error bars indicate the SEM from three different IPs. *P = 0.0004 to 0.03; NS, P = 0.16 to 0.9. (E) Efficacy of XPB depletion by SPR. Western blots was performed from above protein samples and blotted with anti-XPB and anti-SM antibody. The blot was stripped and reprobed with antitubulin as a loading control.
Rabbit Antibody, supplied by Bethyl, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit antibody/product/Bethyl
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rabbit antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Bethyl hrp conjugated goat anti rabbit
Fig. 5. EBV SM increases XPB recruitment to EBV lytic promoters but not to cellular promoters or the major EBV latent promoter. ChIP assays to measure effect of SM on XPB binding to EBV lytic promoters during lytic replication. EBV lytic replication in 293 SMKO EBV-infected cells was induced by transfecting with Z plasmid, or with Z and SM plasmids to both induce replication and rescue SM expression. Cells were also transfected with empty vector as an uninduced control. Induced cells were also treated with SPR (+S) or mock-treated with vehicle. Forty-eight hours after lytic induction, proteins were cross-linked to DNA, sheared, and chromatin was immunoprecipitated using an XPB <t>polyclonal</t> antibody. DNA was extracted from IPs and qPCR was performed for several EBV SM-dependent lytic promoters (A), SM-independent lytic promoters (B), the major EBV latency C promoter (C), or cellular promoters (D), to quantitate XPB occupancy during lytic replication. The fold-enrichment over background was calculated using IgG antibody IP as the control in each sample. The error bars indicate the SEM from three different IPs. *P = 0.0004 to 0.03; NS, P = 0.16 to 0.9. (E) Efficacy of XPB depletion by SPR. Western blots was performed from above protein samples and blotted with anti-XPB and anti-SM antibody. The blot was stripped and reprobed with antitubulin as a loading control.
Hrp Conjugated Goat Anti Rabbit, supplied by Bethyl, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/hrp conjugated goat anti rabbit/product/Bethyl
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
hrp conjugated goat anti rabbit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Bethyl light chain cross adsorbed antibody hrp conjugated
Fig. 5. EBV SM increases XPB recruitment to EBV lytic promoters but not to cellular promoters or the major EBV latent promoter. ChIP assays to measure effect of SM on XPB binding to EBV lytic promoters during lytic replication. EBV lytic replication in 293 SMKO EBV-infected cells was induced by transfecting with Z plasmid, or with Z and SM plasmids to both induce replication and rescue SM expression. Cells were also transfected with empty vector as an uninduced control. Induced cells were also treated with SPR (+S) or mock-treated with vehicle. Forty-eight hours after lytic induction, proteins were cross-linked to DNA, sheared, and chromatin was immunoprecipitated using an XPB <t>polyclonal</t> antibody. DNA was extracted from IPs and qPCR was performed for several EBV SM-dependent lytic promoters (A), SM-independent lytic promoters (B), the major EBV latency C promoter (C), or cellular promoters (D), to quantitate XPB occupancy during lytic replication. The fold-enrichment over background was calculated using IgG antibody IP as the control in each sample. The error bars indicate the SEM from three different IPs. *P = 0.0004 to 0.03; NS, P = 0.16 to 0.9. (E) Efficacy of XPB depletion by SPR. Western blots was performed from above protein samples and blotted with anti-XPB and anti-SM antibody. The blot was stripped and reprobed with antitubulin as a loading control.
Light Chain Cross Adsorbed Antibody Hrp Conjugated, supplied by Bethyl, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/light chain cross adsorbed antibody hrp conjugated/product/Bethyl
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
light chain cross adsorbed antibody hrp conjugated - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Bethyl rabbit igg enzyme linked immunosorbent assay quantification kit
Fig. 5. EBV SM increases XPB recruitment to EBV lytic promoters but not to cellular promoters or the major EBV latent promoter. ChIP assays to measure effect of SM on XPB binding to EBV lytic promoters during lytic replication. EBV lytic replication in 293 SMKO EBV-infected cells was induced by transfecting with Z plasmid, or with Z and SM plasmids to both induce replication and rescue SM expression. Cells were also transfected with empty vector as an uninduced control. Induced cells were also treated with SPR (+S) or mock-treated with vehicle. Forty-eight hours after lytic induction, proteins were cross-linked to DNA, sheared, and chromatin was immunoprecipitated using an XPB <t>polyclonal</t> antibody. DNA was extracted from IPs and qPCR was performed for several EBV SM-dependent lytic promoters (A), SM-independent lytic promoters (B), the major EBV latency C promoter (C), or cellular promoters (D), to quantitate XPB occupancy during lytic replication. The fold-enrichment over background was calculated using IgG antibody IP as the control in each sample. The error bars indicate the SEM from three different IPs. *P = 0.0004 to 0.03; NS, P = 0.16 to 0.9. (E) Efficacy of XPB depletion by SPR. Western blots was performed from above protein samples and blotted with anti-XPB and anti-SM antibody. The blot was stripped and reprobed with antitubulin as a loading control.
Rabbit Igg Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay Quantification Kit, supplied by Bethyl, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit igg enzyme linked immunosorbent assay quantification kit/product/Bethyl
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rabbit igg enzyme linked immunosorbent assay quantification kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

92
Bethyl goat anti rabbit igg
Fig. 5. EBV SM increases XPB recruitment to EBV lytic promoters but not to cellular promoters or the major EBV latent promoter. ChIP assays to measure effect of SM on XPB binding to EBV lytic promoters during lytic replication. EBV lytic replication in 293 SMKO EBV-infected cells was induced by transfecting with Z plasmid, or with Z and SM plasmids to both induce replication and rescue SM expression. Cells were also transfected with empty vector as an uninduced control. Induced cells were also treated with SPR (+S) or mock-treated with vehicle. Forty-eight hours after lytic induction, proteins were cross-linked to DNA, sheared, and chromatin was immunoprecipitated using an XPB <t>polyclonal</t> antibody. DNA was extracted from IPs and qPCR was performed for several EBV SM-dependent lytic promoters (A), SM-independent lytic promoters (B), the major EBV latency C promoter (C), or cellular promoters (D), to quantitate XPB occupancy during lytic replication. The fold-enrichment over background was calculated using IgG antibody IP as the control in each sample. The error bars indicate the SEM from three different IPs. *P = 0.0004 to 0.03; NS, P = 0.16 to 0.9. (E) Efficacy of XPB depletion by SPR. Western blots was performed from above protein samples and blotted with anti-XPB and anti-SM antibody. The blot was stripped and reprobed with antitubulin as a loading control.
Goat Anti Rabbit Igg, supplied by Bethyl, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/goat anti rabbit igg/product/Bethyl
Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
goat anti rabbit igg - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
92/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Fig. 5. EBV SM increases XPB recruitment to EBV lytic promoters but not to cellular promoters or the major EBV latent promoter. ChIP assays to measure effect of SM on XPB binding to EBV lytic promoters during lytic replication. EBV lytic replication in 293 SMKO EBV-infected cells was induced by transfecting with Z plasmid, or with Z and SM plasmids to both induce replication and rescue SM expression. Cells were also transfected with empty vector as an uninduced control. Induced cells were also treated with SPR (+S) or mock-treated with vehicle. Forty-eight hours after lytic induction, proteins were cross-linked to DNA, sheared, and chromatin was immunoprecipitated using an XPB polyclonal antibody. DNA was extracted from IPs and qPCR was performed for several EBV SM-dependent lytic promoters (A), SM-independent lytic promoters (B), the major EBV latency C promoter (C), or cellular promoters (D), to quantitate XPB occupancy during lytic replication. The fold-enrichment over background was calculated using IgG antibody IP as the control in each sample. The error bars indicate the SEM from three different IPs. *P = 0.0004 to 0.03; NS, P = 0.16 to 0.9. (E) Efficacy of XPB depletion by SPR. Western blots was performed from above protein samples and blotted with anti-XPB and anti-SM antibody. The blot was stripped and reprobed with antitubulin as a loading control.

Journal: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Article Title: Epstein-Barr virus co-opts TFIIH component XPB to specifically activate essential viral lytic promoters.

doi: 10.1073/pnas.2000625117

Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 5. EBV SM increases XPB recruitment to EBV lytic promoters but not to cellular promoters or the major EBV latent promoter. ChIP assays to measure effect of SM on XPB binding to EBV lytic promoters during lytic replication. EBV lytic replication in 293 SMKO EBV-infected cells was induced by transfecting with Z plasmid, or with Z and SM plasmids to both induce replication and rescue SM expression. Cells were also transfected with empty vector as an uninduced control. Induced cells were also treated with SPR (+S) or mock-treated with vehicle. Forty-eight hours after lytic induction, proteins were cross-linked to DNA, sheared, and chromatin was immunoprecipitated using an XPB polyclonal antibody. DNA was extracted from IPs and qPCR was performed for several EBV SM-dependent lytic promoters (A), SM-independent lytic promoters (B), the major EBV latency C promoter (C), or cellular promoters (D), to quantitate XPB occupancy during lytic replication. The fold-enrichment over background was calculated using IgG antibody IP as the control in each sample. The error bars indicate the SEM from three different IPs. *P = 0.0004 to 0.03; NS, P = 0.16 to 0.9. (E) Efficacy of XPB depletion by SPR. Western blots was performed from above protein samples and blotted with anti-XPB and anti-SM antibody. The blot was stripped and reprobed with antitubulin as a loading control.

Article Snippet: Cleared supernatants were incubated with 5 μg of rabbit polyclonal IgG (Bethyl, P120-101) and 50 μL of 50% Protein-A agarose beads slurry to preclear supernatants for 2 h at 4 °C.

Techniques: Binding Assay, Infection, Plasmid Preparation, Expressing, Transfection, Control, Immunoprecipitation, Western Blot